The objectives of this research are : “The Opinions of Teachers and Students toward the Monk’s roles in the Teaching of Dhamma Studies in schools of Bangyai District, Nonthaburi Province” are : 1) to study the opinion of Teachers and Students toward the Monk’s roles in the Teaching of Dhamma Studies in schools of Bangyai District, Nonthaburi Province 2) to study the compare of the opinion of Teachers and Students toward the Monk’s roles in the Teaching of Dhamma Studies in schools of Bangyai District, Nonthaburi Province and 3) to study the problems, the obstacle and the suggestion of Teachers and Students toward the monks roles in the teaching of Dhamma Studies at schools in Bangyai District Nonthaburi Province. This research used the Survey Research to collect the data from 307 teachers and students of Wat Sakul-ngain and Satri Nonthaburi Bang Yai (Nonthakijpisarn) by using Taro Yamane’s technique and Convenience Sampling. The instrument used for data collecting was opened / closed questionnaires. The reliability was 0.9458. The researcher analyzed data by using the percentage, the mean, the standard deviation and tested the hypothesis by using T-test.
The result of this research found that :
(1) The overall opinions of teachers and students toward the monks role in Teaching of Dhamma Studies at school in Bangyai District, Nonthaburi Province were found at high level in all aspects ( = 4.39, S.D= 0.39) – Having considered by each aspect, it was rated at highest level ( =4.36, S.D= 0.36) at Teaching Material aspect and at lowest level ( = 4.21, S.D= 0.27) at teaching technique.
(2) To comparatively study the opinion of teacher and students toward the monks’ roles in the teaching of Dhamma Studies in schools at Bangyai District, Pathumthani Province. It was found that there is no difference. Consequently, the hypothesis is rejected.
(3) For the problems and obstacles of the Opinions of Teachers and Students toward the Monk’s roles in the Teaching of Dhamma Studies at schools in Bangyai District, Nonthaburi Province depended on the motivations such as less commission fee, work’s independence, having limited time to teach, lack of supporting from the school directors, less acknowledgement and respect. Some teachers thought that the moral priests used to be their students so they didn’t give the real acknowledgement to the priests. The school administrators, the teachers and the students didn’t have cooperation together and they also lacked of cooperation with the moral priests. Moreover, the moral priests didn’t have enough teaching aids and lacked of teaching materials. School teachers and moral priests didn’t exchange the teaching techniques and the way to produce aids. The other problem was the lack of teaching management, studying timetable and evaluation.
|